![]() |
| Keisha Chante and the dancers. (I am the third one from the right.) |
![]() |
| Dance rehearsal time. (I am the first girl with long straight hair.) |
This reminds me of the time I was at a dance audition for the TV series Mahalia staring Canadian R&B singer Keisha Chante. One of the episodes had a short music video within it, and local dancers were auditioning to be background dancers. I recall one girl at the audition with a background only in street dance. I have personally seen her dancing and she is a very good dancer. But the choreography in this audition was solely taught with counts and she was unable to follow. Out of the 4 background dancers chosen, I was probably the weakest dancer but I had the look the director wanted, and was advantaged over the other girl as I had experience with dance counts. The girl who was cut also had the look the director was seeking but her dancing appeared weak as she struggled to adequately participate in the formal customs of trained dancer's communities of practice. Had she been exposed to this method of dance training, then I'm positive she would have been selected as a background dancer.
I have also been involved in a dance piece that required nothing more than talent, ability, and speed. When I performed my show "What Iz Hip Hop?" in the Atlantic Fringe Festival a few years back, there was a stomp dance routine within the show. There was no need of dance count usage for my dance troupe! Just hardcore stomp with hands, feet, and crushed pop cans!The system of dance counts is a shared way of connecting dancers in their communities of practice. However, it also excludes dancers who do not utilize this system such as street dancers. There are many hip hop dancers that do not use this system and yet can dance better than any trained dancer. Some of these dancers are so talented that they can follow a dance count instantly without any background experience. There are also trained dancers that have participated in multiple intensive dance courses that know all the moves yet lack rhythm and talent. They are simply doing the correct moves but can't dance.
Do boundary objects always include forms of power relations? I have not answered this question in my blog, but feel it is a valuable question to pose inquiry. Boundary objects are a way of defining membership and prescribing shared meaning. This can be experienced by some as a positive experience as they feel connected and a sense of belonging. It can also have a negative experience to others who want to belong but feel excluded, or outsiders who feel that membership are exclusive to certain people who possess specific resources. An example of this is post-secondary communities of practice in which participants must pay for education and hold academic pre-requisites. I gave the example of the dance community both inviting members to feel a shared connection, as well as excluding some dancers. Can you think of other communities of practice that represent a form of inclusion and exclusion for the participants that appear to be engaged members?
References
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (1st ed.). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Picture 1 & 2: Personal pictures I uploaded.
Mahlia TV series (the episode that the dance routine for "Let It Rain"):


Hi Natalie!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your talk about boundary objects through your linkage of the idea with your experience with dance (side note: it is -SO- cool you were able to dance with Keisha Chante! Congrats!). As a former "dancer" (emphasis on the quotation marks- I was in a dance class, but I was put in the back for good reason), it was a nice analogy to demonstrate Wenger's theory. I experienced those boundaries first hand, and was constantly reminded that I was hardly a part of that particular community of practice because of them.
Maureen
Hi Natalie: I found your association of boundary objects with dance training to be fascinating. I certainly can't credit the single ballet class I took with cementing my place within a community of practice of dance, but I'd certainly agree with you that even the resources of that community of practice can act as boundary objects. For instance, I remember that I had to ask my mother for help at the start of every class with tying up my ballet shoes because the ribbons were so long and tricky. Years later, I can see that the shoes were/are a boundary object that signifies that community's insiders and outsiders. Given the range of dance styles you've described here, I wonder if it would be fair to identify some of the dancers with weaknesses in other styles as engaging in legitimate peripheral practice (I'm thinking of Wenger's discussion on page 100); that is, moving towards a community of practice but not there yet... Interesting ideas to ponder - thanks again!
ReplyDeleteI too, was very interested in the boundary objects that the movie Crash explored. As we were watching the movie it became easy to relate Wenger’s idea’s of community practice, identities, participation and boundary objects to the characters and their lives. I think the negative tone of the movie highlighted various connections and levels of engagement.
ReplyDeleteOne of the finest parts of learning through blogging is finding out how others relate to what we are doing in class and to other aspects of their lives. Our blogs contain insight into our families, pets, hobbies, cultures, and life experiences. Dance was a great example of how learning and community practice is present in areas that I had not considered before.